Mento

What does coaching give you back?

93%of leaders perform better after coaching
98%say it's worth the investment
4.94average coach rating out of 5
95%annual member retention
98%month-over-month usage
100%of Mento coaches are operators

Start here

Two questions. Everything else has a sourced benchmark behind it.

$benchmark
$benchmark

How optimistic should the assumptions be?

Adjust the assumptions

Running on 12 benchmarks. Open this and swap in the numbers you know — it changes the answer.

Open

Your workforce

Anything left blank keeps the benchmark shown in grey.

%benchmark
%benchmark

Keeping people

Fewer regrettable exits among the coached group.

%benchmark

The teams they lead

Direct reports only. The wider org underneath them isn't counted.

%benchmark
benchmark
$benchmark
%benchmark

Getting more done

Output gain, valued at salary as a stand-in.

%benchmark

Promoting from inside

Searches you don't have to run.

%benchmark
%benchmark

How much of this is coaching?

Nothing happens in isolation. Discount the result by the share you'd credit to the program.

50%
credited to coaching
10% — a contributing factor100%

Source: Mento ROI Workbook, which uses 50% for retention gains and 70% for executive impact.

In their words

Dropbox

“We've invested in a lot of leadership development over the years. Mento is one that people actually prioritize and proactively ask to continue. Within a couple of sessions, they are all in. That kind of pull is rare, and it tells you something real is happening.”

Karlee PierceLearning Design & Innovation
Amper

“It's a no-brainer to invest in augmenting our team's skills through Mento. Investing in coaching means we're more likely to hit our business milestones and retain our highest performers. At the same time, the team loves working with their Mento coaches.”

Akshat ThiraniPresident
Brex

“Top talent at Brex goes on to lead departments and found companies, so we invest in their growth accordingly. Mento pairs our leaders with coaches who've built and scaled teams themselves. It's development that matches the ambition of our people.”

Ian SanderHead of Talent Management
Every benchmark, and where it comes from

Any field left blank uses the figure below. They're set at or under the published range on purpose — a number your CFO believes beats a number that impresses.

AssumptionBenchmarkSource
Cost per person$8,000Mento Leadership tier list rate, $8,000 per person per year. Your quote may differ.
Average salary$205,000Salary.com, August 2026: IT Director base $204,926. Glassdoor puts Director of Technology at $193,564.
Voluntary attrition10%Mercer US Turnover Survey (2,617 organisations): 13% average voluntary turnover. Senior levels run below the all-employee average, so this sits at 10%.
Replacement cost100%Gallup: 0.5–2× salary, up to 200% for leaders. SHRM: over 150% for managers and leaders. Set at the bottom of both ranges.
Share who manage people90%Assumes nearly everyone at this level runs a team. Adjust down if the cohort includes senior individual contributors.
Direct reports each7Gallup: two-thirds of managers have fewer than 10 direct reports. Deloitte research puts 7–10 as typical for knowledge work; McKinsey puts senior executives at 3–7.
Salary of those reports$130,000Salary.com benchmarks for the level immediately below the cohort.
Attrition reduction, coached20%Fortune reports 45% lower turnover at companies investing in leadership coaching; a 2024 study in the International Journal of Organizational Leadership links coaching-driven employability to 46% lower intent to leave. Set well below both.
Team attrition reduction10%Half the direct effect, by convention. Gallup attributes roughly 70% of the variance in team engagement to the manager.
Productivity gain4%Nicolau et al. (2023) meta-analysis of randomised control trials, Frontiers in Psychology, finds coaching outperforms traditional development by about 1.3×; 93% of Mento members report stronger performance. Set far below both.
Extra internal moves5%The Mento ROI Workbook targets 10–15% internal mobility; this counts only the incremental moves coaching adds.
External hire cost25%Contingency and retained search fees typically run 20–25% of first-year salary, before recruiter time and ramp.
How each line is worked out

Keeping people. The regrettable exits you'd have had, times the share coaching prevents, times what each replacement costs.

people × attrition × reduction × (salary × replacement cost)

The teams they lead. The same arithmetic one level down, across the direct reports of everyone coached.

managers × direct reports × attrition × team reduction × (their salary × replacement cost)

Getting more done. Salary stands in for the value of someone's output. It understates revenue roles and overstates some support functions.

people × salary × productivity gain

Promoting from inside. Every internal move is an external search you didn't run.

people × extra internal moves × (salary × external hire cost)

The four are added, multiplied by attribution, and the program cost is subtracted.

Why the time horizon applies to both sides

It's tempting to set three years of savings against one year of cost. It produces a much better number, and a CFO will spot it immediately.

Here the horizon multiplies benefits and cost together, so a three-year view assumes you keep running the program and keep getting the result. Year one is the honest default.

ROI and return per dollar are different numbers

These get mixed up constantly. If a program costs $100,000 and returns $460,000 in credited value: ROI is 360%, the amount you're up over what you spent. Return per dollar is $4.60, of which $3.60 is profit.

Both are shown. Pick one and stay with it for the whole conversation.